Image
Icon

Directory

IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconCompare Medical Scheme Benefits
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconExpatriate Cover
IconHealthcare Consultants
IconMedical Aid Brokers
IconMedical Aid Schemes
IconMedical Schemes Trustees Liability Insurance
IconMedical Service Providers
IconNiche Medical Insurance Products
IconOmbud
IconOnline Quotes
IconPublications
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconWellness Programs
Image
  Subscribe To »

Treating Customers Fairly self-assessment pilot – kudos and concerns

Published

2012

Thu

31

May

As part of the roll out of its Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) programme, the Financial Services Board (FSB) has piloted a self assessment tool that, once finalised, will enable regulated firms to gauge their success in achieving the six TCF fairness outcomes.  The results of the pilot were presented at the recent 9th Cape Conference of the Compliance Institute Southern Africa. 

 

TCF is a programme for regulating the market conduct of financial services firms, and ensuring that customers are treated fairly.  The FSB has developed a roadmap for its implementation, which will include recommendations for new legislation to enforce it. 

 

The aim of the pilot was to obtain industry feedback on the usefulness of the draft TCF self-assessment tool.  Twenty firms participated, but as most of them were large to medium sized groups with multiple regulated entities, the FSB received more than 50 completed questionnaires, covering more than 250 FSB licensed entities.

 

“Overall the feedback was detailed, comprehensive, and most participants took the process seriously,” said Leanne Jackson, head of Treating Customers Fairly at the FSB.   The pilot also resulted in in-depth  follow up meetings between the FSB and participants, further enriching the feedback. 

 

Several examples of good practice emerged from the pilot, and these have been included in the FSB’s report, which is available on its website. “We aren’t necessarily recommending those practices, however, as we haven’t verified or checked them.”

 

She said some firms aren’t doing much to embed TCF in their organisations because the legislation hasn’t been finalised.  But Jackson said that although the FSB would be providing ongoing guidance, there was no need to wait for that before starting their TCF implementation plans, as the six outcomes were at the heart of the programme and firms should be making progress on delivering on them.

 

Some companies are still asking the FSB how to define fairness, for example, or trying to define it for themselves, but the FSB has purposely not defined it.  “We’ve listed the six fairness outcomes and those will be the litmus test for compliance, not a theoretical definition of fairness,” she said.

 

Of particular concern was a general lack of strategic focus on TCF. Critically, many companies with a customer service strategy took that to be their TCF strategy.  According to Jackson, however, TCF needs to be thought through right across a group’s strategy as it could impact on profitability, marketing, business processes, product design, human resources, distribution and more.

 

“Firms don’t generally foresee substantial changes to their strategies and operations.  Rather, they predict a need to ‘tweak’ existing processes to more visibly and ‘formally’ demonstrate existing commitments to TCF. We wonder if that’s actually realistic.”

 

She said companies tended to think that TCF was implicit in the way they operate, but it’s not something they’ve thought about formally.  But they’ll need to demonstrate delivery of the TCF outcomes to the FSB, which will require some degree of formalisation. 

 

She also said there was confusion between customer satisfaction and fair treatment of customers. “They may overlap, but they’re not the same thing.” 

 

Julie Methven, CEO of the Compliance Institute of Southern Africa, said that TCF was a good example of a shift from purely rules-based regulations to principles-based regulations. “Compliance officers can no longer simply adopt a tick-box approach.  Instead, they have to apply a host of principles and guidelines to their businesses and support management in ensuring compliance accordingly.”

 
Source: Claire Densham Communications
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

Vigilance key to protecting children over the school holidays

Greater awareness of child safety can assist in preventing injuries “There is a marked increase in the number of toddlers who are treated at Netcare hospital emergency departments over the summer holidays ...
Read More »

  

Old Mutual and Nedbank pledge $1m to help fight Ebola

Old Mutual and Nedbank have jointly pledged $1 million towards the recently announced African Union-Private Sector Ebola fund. The fund’s overall vision is long-term and includes rebuilding affected economies ...
Read More »

  

Key questions to ask when changing medical scheme

It’s that time of year when you may be considering changing your medical scheme. Liberty Medical Scheme’s Executive Principal Officer, Andrew Edwards, outlines the key questions you should be asking ...
Read More »

  

Directors and Reckless Conduct: Disregarding Standards of Care

Article by Terrance M. Booysen, CEO, CGF Research Institute (Pty) Ltd Johannesburg: There has hardly been a day that goes by where the media headlines do not grip the attention of citizens, announcing yet another ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Investment »

Image

Life »

Image

Retirement »

Image

Short-term »

Advertise Here

Quick Survey »

  Sponsored by
Image
Can there be fair discrimination in the workplace?



|Results »
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Credit Rating:

A company rating given by a credit agency, on the likelihood of the company defaulting on its debt. Credit ratings by reputable agencies are used to value investments relative to one another.
More Definitions »

 
 
By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Stoker Risk & ICT (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2014.
All Rights Reserved.
Icon

Advertise

  Icon

eZine

  Icon

Contact IG

Icon

Media Pack

  Icon

RSS Feeds