We encounter a variety of attempts by a limited number of candidates to cheat the system. As evidenced by the example in a recent Appeal Board case, crime really does not pay.
The transgressor appealed against a three-year debarment. The Appeal Board found that the person should actually have been debarred for much longer.
There are a number of security measures built into various systems to detect fraudulent actions. For obvious reasons, we cannot elaborate on this, safe to say that it is virtually fool proof.
It is, however, not only the penalty for the transgression that will affect you. I receive many requests for assistance from people who sincerely regret their actions, but now find it virtually impossible to get reappointed in the industry after expiry of their debarment period. To re-enter the industry, you need a “sponsor” to vouch for your future conduct. Finding someone willing to do that is very, very difficult.
Don’t commit fraud, however big the temptation. It is simply not worth it.
Source: Paul Kruger: Moonstone Compliance (Pty) Ltd
The decision in the Hlumbane case by the Appeal Board of the FSB provides very interesting information about the Board’s powers in terms of decisions made by the Registrar of Financial Services Providers, ... Read More »
The medical scheme industry has many challenges. In order for schemes to survive in the current medical climate, all members have to be constructively involved and understand both the products they have bought ... Read More »
There is some controversy about alternative reimbursement models in the commercial healthcare industry. Global fees contracts - where a single payment is made to a healthcare team to cover all costs including hospitals, ... Read More »
Matthew Donen, Senior Private Equity Analyst, RisCura
Mobile technology is rapidly transforming the way business is being conducted in Africa, particularly in the healthcare industry, as a result of ... Read More »