Image
Icon

Directory

IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconFinancial Planners
IconLife Insurance Companies
IconLife Insurance Products
IconOmbud
IconOnline Quotes
IconPublic Loss Adjustors
IconPublications
IconRe-insurance Companies
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconSocial Grants (Government)
IconWellness Programs
Advertise Here
  Subscribe To »

A loss Consumers can ill afford

Published

2012

Mon

06

Feb

The FSB regularly provides an update on the number of licences which were suspended or withdrawn and those whose status was reinstated after withdrawal or suspension.

The table below provides details of such reports released over the last 13 months.
 

FSP update on:

Suspended

Suspension Lifted

Licences Withdrawn

Licences Reinstated

30/01/2012

514

79

3

 

13/01/2012

10

123

125

7

03/10/2011

3

323

15

9

10/11/2011

826

56

10

22

23/09/2011

27

122

15

22

15/08/2011

258

57

21

25

22/07/2011

57

50

15

33

19/05/2011

26

106

502

22

31/05/2011

67

158

5

19

16/05/2011

909

114

23

20

15/03/2011

29

10

8

17

18/02/2011

5

46

1485

2

Total

2731

1244

2227

198

 

The majority of suspensions and withdrawals were imposed as a result of non-payment of levies and failure to submit compliance reports and/financial statements when due.

It is difficult to believe that FSPs are still unaware of these requirements, 8 years after the FAIS Act was implemented. There must be other reasons for this loss in FSP numbers.

A closer look reveals that the “offs” (4 958) outnumber the “back ons” (1 442) by 3 516.

This is a staggering number in anybody’s language.

As someone who has spent a large part of his career recruiting, appointing and training financial advisors, I am more than aware of the high turnover of advisors in the industry. Positive growth in real numbers is a major achievement under normal circumstances.

What makes the figures even more startling is the fact that we are not talking about 3 516 individuals; these are licenced entities, often comprising reps and clerical staff. The real damage is therefore considerably bigger than the figures would suggest.

Whilst there is no empirical evidence to support this, we are of the opinion that a substantial number of advisors plan to exit the industry when the deadline for the writing the regulatory examinations arrive.

Most of these will be vastly experienced practitioners. To calculate the impact on the quality of advice is not possible, but it will be vast, and in stark contrast with the aim of regulation, namely to improve the service given to consumers.

Proposed future changes in the industry include the introduction of a “Treat the Customer Fairly” set of rules and a review of commission, with the stated intent of changing advisor remuneration to a fees-based model. There are also plans to introduce a Super ombud to replace the current system of industry appointed ombuds.

One must assume that the figures quoted above will be taken into account when plans are made to implement further control measures.

There are certain positive signs as well: the current requirements in terms of financial soundness is under review, and we think that other measures are also receiving attention, mainly as a result of the financial impact thereof on the the smaller FSPs.

Most of what we see in place today, in terms of regulation, stems from what is used overseas, particularly in the UK and Australia.

Whilst there is no need to re-invent the wheel, one wonders how much consideration was given to our uniquely South African set-up, particularly from a demographics perspective of consumers of financial product consumers?

As we said in an earlier article: the cost of financial advice could become so expensive that only the rich would be able to afford it.

Where would that leave those consumers most in need of it?

To paraphrase an old saying:

If you think advice is expensive, consider the cost of ignorance.

 
Source: Paul Kruger: Moonstone Information Refinery (Pty) Ltd
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

GeoPoll, GEN and U.S. State Department Release Survey Showing Demand for Entrepreneurship Training in Africa

Survey Targets 1,000 Entrepreneurs Across Five African Countries NAIROBI, Kenya: On the eve of U. S. President Barack Obama’s visit to Kenya for the Global Entrepreneurship Summit, GeoPoll (http://www. ...
Read More »

  

Cancer and heart disease leading causes of life insurance claims

It’s no secret that our modern day lifestyles are bad for our health and statistics released by Hollard Life seem to confirm this. Heart disease and cancer are by far the leading causes of all claims across ...
Read More »

  

Diepsloot goes cyber this Mandela month with 67 days of digital activism

Johannesburg: In the spirit of making every day Mandela Day, The Wot-If? Trust and its partners are embarking on 67 Days of Digital Activism, launching in Diepsloot on 22, 23 and 24 July 2015. “This is in ...
Read More »

  

FAIS - Special Audit on Sign-On Bonuses and Churning

FAIS Newsletter 17 contains details of the outcome of this special compliance audit to investigate the link between the payment of sign-on bonuses and the replacing of products as a result thereof. The sign-on ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Healthcare »

Image

Investment »

Image

Retirement »

Image

Short-term »

Advertise Here
Image
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Technology Sector Funds:

These funds focus on companies whose primary business activity involves science and technology and changes to technology. These funds are more volatile and risky than funds that invest across all sectors of the JSE. There is no benchmark yet.
More Definitions »

 
 
By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Stoker Risk & ICT (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2015.
All Rights Reserved.
Icon

Advertise

  Icon

eZine

  Icon

Contact IG

Icon

Media Pack

  Icon

RSS Feeds