Advertise Here
Icon

Directory

IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconCompare Medical Scheme Benefits
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconExpatriate Cover
IconHealthcare Consultants
IconMedical Aid Brokers
IconMedical Aid Schemes
IconMedical Malpractice Cover
IconMedical Schemes Trustees Liability Insurance
IconMedical Service Providers
IconOmbud
IconOnline Quotes
IconPublications
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconWellness Programs
Advertise Here
  Subscribe To »

When is it ok to take your Ex-Spouse off Health Insurance – how things work in the USA

Published

2014

Wed

23

Jul

By Attorney Bruce Provda of Provda Law Firm (http://nydivorcefirm.com/ )

Every year, over 1 million people get divorced and hundreds of thousands more separate only to become next year’s divorce statistic. Within recent memory, health insurance was routinely awarded by the courts. The supporting spouse, usually the husband, not only supported the family post-divorce, but also made sure health insurance was available. Not any more.

Health care costs in America are breaking records and the economics of health insurance are at crisis proportions. People tend to believe, “It won’t happen to me,” but losing health insurance in a divorce is likely to happen. Here’s how it can happen.

Most family health insurance in the US is made available by employers. The dissolution of the marriage means, usually, the end of employer-provided coverage for the family; not just the spouse, but the children as well. Even if employer-provided health coverage continues, the cost is guaranteed to grow to the point of possibly being unaffordable — often larger than a mortgage payment.

To make things more complicated, divorce rates for couples 55 and over are rising. Americans in this age group often have more complex health insurance planning concerns because of the related retiree health care plans such as Medicare, Medigap and long-term care issues.

Because of the economic implications, premiums for health coverage should not be an adversarial issue at divorce. Health insurance coverage and planning is important to everyone involved: husband, wife and children.

COBRA

The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 was enacted to stop health insurance lapses when certain qualifying events occurred. The two types of beneficiaries applicable in this article are a) non-employee spouses and b) dependent children. The only two types of “qualifying events” with regards to this article are a) divorce or legal separation and b) a dependent child gets older and ceases to be a dependent.

The employer who has a health plan for employees, but has less than 20 eligible employees during the preceding twelve months, is not subject to COBRA laws. The employer is not required to offer continuing coverage to non-employee spouses or adult children under the federal law.

Normally, to be required to continue providing coverage to non-employee spouses and adult children the employer must have more than 20 employees. If the employer meets this threshold and a legal separation or divorce occurs, coverage can be continued if the non-employee spouse does three things: a) properly chooses to continue coverage within allowed time limits, b) pays the first premium on time, and c) continues to pay the premiums as they come due. As long as these three rules are followed, coverage may be effective back to the day of the divorce or separation and will continue for to a maximum of three years.

Two cases may serve to illustrate the complexity of post-divorce health coverage.

Lomaglio v Lomaglio

In 1998, Larry & Carmen Lomaglio divorced. Mr. Lomaglio was instructed in the divorce decree to provide maintenance for Mrs. Lomaglio for a period not to exceed 18 months. The decree did not require him to contribute any amount to Mrs. Lomaglio’s health coverage costs.

In 1999 Mrs. Lomaglio went back to court asking that her ex-husband be required to provide for her health coverage. After a trial, the court denied her request for modification of the maintenance agreement. She appealed the decision and won a reversal. The appeals court ruled that because of her medical condition, which was apt to be permanent, Mr. Lomaglio would have to continue to provide the same level of health coverage that he provided during the marriage.

Mr. Lomaglio covered the premiums for the insurance form 2000 until 2008 when he stopped paying. Mr. Lomaglio’s ex-spouse took him to court again and this time she lost. The court cited the Domestic Relations Law when it ruled saying that “…providing health insurance benefits was not meant to exceed such period of time as such party shall be obligated to provide maintenance…”

Henig v. Henig

Marc & Gina Henig were married in 1988 and had three children. The couple separated and divorced in 2009. During the Preliminary Conference, the court appointed experts to evaluate the couple’s marital assets.

Mr. Henig had been a New York City Police Officer, a position from which he retired in 2007. Part of his retirement package includes lifetime medical, dental and vision benefits for himself, his wife and children. Mrs. Henig’s attorney argued that Mr. Henig’s health benefits should be treated like his pension and considered a marital asset thus allowing the former Mrs. Henig access to health coverage through her ex-husband’s former employer.

The question the court looked at was whether the lifetime health benefits constitutes property and therefore is a “marital asset.” In Henig v. Henig, the court ruled that while access to health coverage was mutually available, the former Ms. Henig failed to access coverage through COBRA as outlined in federal law.

As with many things when it comes to divorce, issues can be complicated and confusing. The cases cited are just two of the hundreds of decisions reached each year. The advice and guidance of an experienced divorce attorney and family lawyer should be sought as early in the dissolution of marriage process as is possible.

 
Source: Jenny Miranda Public Relations, LLC
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

Hospital Association of South Africa Announces New Board

The Hospital Association of South Africa elected a new Board at its Annual General Meeting earlier this month, in Johannesburg. André Joseph from Life Healthcare replaces Dr Biren Valodia from Mediclinic ...
Read More »

  

To have and to hold a signed Will

National Wills Week will be held from 13 to 17 September 2021. This is an ideal opportunity to draft a Will or to review an existing Will. In recent times, we have come to realise that death can happen to ...
Read More »

  

Covid-19 Vaccine Distribution Risks and Insurance: Q&A with Allianz Specialists

As COVID-19 vaccine distribution rolls out across Africa and the world, insurers of the pharmaceutical industry are in a position to share their experience as to what constitutes a successful and safe distribution ...
Read More »

  

Lower-than-usual medical scheme contribution increases likely – GTC Healthcare Consulting

This year, for the first time, it seems likely that medical schemes will announce contribution increases which are in line with recommendations suggested by The Council for Medical Schemes (CMS). This ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Investment »

Image

Life »

Image

Retirement »

Image

Short-term »

Advertise Here
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Expert:

A person with extensive and proven knowledge and experience of estate planning, wills, trusts and deceased estates as well as all laws and estate planning techniques that are involved.
More Definitions »

 

Advertise

 

eZine

 

Contact IG

 

Media Pack

 

RSS Feeds

By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Insurance Gateway (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2021. All Rights Reserved.