IconAlternative Investments
IconAsset Managers
IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconFinancial Planners
IconInvestment Consulting
IconLinked Investment Service Providers
IconListed Equities
IconOnline Share Trading
IconParticipation Bond Managers
IconProperty Unit Trusts
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconStock Exchange
IconUnit Trust Fund Managers
IconWellness Programs
Advertise Here
  Subscribe To »

ZAR X applauds FSB Appeal Board for throwing out JSE application






ZAR X, South Africa’s new stock exchange, today (Wednesday, October 5) welcomed the decision of the FSB Appeal Board to dismiss the JSE’s urgent application for the suspension of the FSB decision to grant ZAR X a stock exchange licence.
The FSB granted ZAR X its licence to operate as a stock exchange on August 31, clearing the way for the launch of South Africa’s first new stock exchange in more than 100 years. ZAR X sets out a new vision for stock exchange operations by introducing a low-cost model that promotes financial inclusion for both investors and issuers.
ZAR X director Geoff Cook commented: “We welcome the FSB judgment. Deputy Chair of the Appeal Board Judge LTC Harms clearly states there is no evidence the JSE would suffer harm or prejudice. It is disappointing that the JSE has persisted in their strategy of pusuing technical legal processes in an attempt to delay the emergence of a genuine competitor.
“The JSE’s latest failed attempt questioned the process followed by the FSB and raised the spurious possibility of harm to investors and the country’s financial system. The suggestion that competition to the JSE is bad for investors and financial markets is not only baseless, it poses a risk to the hard-won reputation of South Africa’s robust and efficient financial system.
ZAR X pointed out that, among other things, the Appeal Board ruling had noted:
  • The application failed at the first hurdle as there was no allegation the JSE as appellant would suffer harm or prejudice.
  • On costs, if the judge had had the power he would have made an order in favour of ZAR X.
  • On the merits of the case, this was “not a matter where it can be said with confidence the appeal will succeed”.
The main JSE appeal against the award of a stock exchange licence to ZAR X will be heard at a future date. Hopefully, the judgment will discourage the continuation of the main appeal as well as any other party looking to employ a similar tactic.
Source: Clear Distinction Communications
« Back to previous page Print this page » |

Breaking News »


According to the 2019 Old Mutual Savings and Retirement Monitor, less than 30% of people are saving for emergencies and more than 42% are not making contributions to formal retirement savings. Coupled with this, ...
Read More »


What SA investors can learn from the case of Greek government bonds

Justin Floor, PSG Asset Management   Ten-year Greek government bonds – deemed ‘uninvestable’ at the height of the eurozone crisis – are currently yielding 2. What makes this ...
Read More »


Introducing Our New Website!

The Insurance Gateway® team is excited to share our new website with you. Given our strategic objectives for 2019 and the fact that our last website redesign was over five years ago, we decided on a much anticipated ...
Read More »


Exciting prospects in both equities and bonds, despite negative sentiment

A prolonged period of poor performance from the local equity market has left many investors anxious and frustrated. While most understand the importance of taking a long-term view, it’s usually more difficult ...
Read More »


More News »


Healthcare »


Life »


Retirement »


Short-term »

Advertise Here
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »


Incurred Loss:

See incurred claim.
More Definitions »






Contact IG


Media Pack


RSS Feeds

By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Insurance Gateway (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2019. All Rights Reserved.