Image
Icon

Directory

IconAppraisers and Valuers
IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconDefensive Driver Training
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconForensic Investigation Services
IconInsurance Brokers - Alphabetical Listing
IconInsurance Brokers by Type of Product or Service Needed
IconInsurance Companies
IconInsurance Consultants
IconLightning Damage & Surge Protection Specialists
IconOmbud
IconOnline Quotes and Cover
IconPremium Financing
IconPublic Loss Adjustors
IconPublications
IconRating Agencies
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconRisk Finance
IconRisk Management
IconRisk Surveyors
IconSalvage Operators
IconTelephone Quotes
IconVehicle Accident Management
IconVehicle and Household Risk Inspection Services
IconVehicle Tracking
IconWellness Programs
Advertise Here
  Subscribe To »

The Pandemic, Physical Damage, Business Interruption Losses and Reinsurance

Published

2020

Tue

07

Apr

 

The Pandemic, Physical Damage, Business Interruption Losses and Reinsurance

How is your 2000 piece jigsaw puzzle progressing? 

 

Coronavirus and physical damage

You may have seen reference to the recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in MDS Inc v Factory Mutual Insurance Company (FM Global) (2020) ONSC 1924.  A copy of the judgment is attached.

The judgment has been punted as “significantly increasing the possibility of coverage for business interruption arising from Covid-19”.   

The judgment needs to be approached with significant caution.  It is of course a Canadian judgment and only persuasive and not binding on South African courts. 

It dealt, inter alia with what constitutes “physical damage” in the context of an all-risks property insurance policy.  In the context the insurer unsuccessfully argued that the mere loss of use of the premises did not give rise to physical damage, insisting that there must be “tangible” property damage.

 

Asides from not being South African authority on the point, the judgment is distinguishable for various reasons.  The case dealt with an all-risks property insurance policy.  The traditional South African business interruption section wording is not all-risks. It requires damages defined emanating usually from the fire perils listed under the fire section of the policy.  The case also turned on the wording of the exception raised by the insurer and on which the insurer bore the onus. It was accepted that on the all-risks basis but for application of the exception the policy would be required to respond.

 

It is for the insured to bring themselves into the four corners of the business interruption section of the policy and discharge the onus on the probabilities in that regard.

The case also arose in a different context, the proactive shutdown, for safety reasons of a nuclear facility that was not actually damaged but in respect of which there was actually the presence of leaking heavy water.  In most cases there is unlikely to be the actual presence of  coronavirus or a coronavirus positive person upon the insured premises.

Of course in each case the specific wording of the policy needs to be considered on the facts. Whether loss of use is damage in the context remains unlikely.

 

The judgment is a lengthy one.

When you have finished your 2000 piece puzzle and have nothing else to do  it is worth a read in particular the consideration of the case law examples given regarding damage and physical damage. 

 

Reinsurance

 

In the anticipation of Coronavirus claims and the determination of your policy responses, your reinsurance coverage should not be forgotten.  Is there reinsurance cover back-to-back?  And what is the claim settlement authority?

 

Is the cover follow the fortunes or follow the settlements?

The risk is of course where an insurer agrees to settle claims without being able to establish that on the balance of probabilities it has a legal liability to do  there may well be a challenge to collecting such settlements from reinsurers.

For example of a full follow the settlement clause see Insurance Company of Africa v Scor [1985] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 312. For an exception example, see Wasa v Lexington, [2009] UK HL 40.

Also consider the effects of any “double proviso” follow clause.  See for example Hill v M&G [1996] 1 WLR 1239.  The double proviso clause usually requires a cedent to prove that the loss falls within the terms of both the original and the reinsurance contract.  It may not be sufficient for the purpose of that clause to rely on the advice of a lawyer . In Commercial Union Assurance Company PLC. v NRG Victory Reinsurance Ltd [1998] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 600 the court said that the question whether it was arguable that the  reinsurer might be not liable to the reinsureds was for the Court to decide.

 


  Downloads »

TypeSize
MDS Inc v Factory Mutual Insurance Company (FM Global) (2020) ONSC 1924
IconPDF
5 MB
 
Source: Donald Dinnie - Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

First edition of the Ombudsman’s Briefcase for 2021

In our first edition of the Ombudsman’s Briefcase for 2021 we take this opportunity to wish you a safe and prosperous year ahead. We face this year with a little more hope having emerged from a second wave ...
Read More »

  

Holiday safety is more than just locking up and being vigilant

It is no secret that the holiday period presents an opportunity for criminals to take advantage of holiday goers. According to the South African crime statistics for 2020 released by Stats SA and the South African ...
Read More »

  

POPIA 101

All businesses with employees, customers and suppliers must comply with POPIA, which comes into effect on 1 July 2021. Here is a practical guide to the most important aspects   With the commencement ...
Read More »

  

F&I shifting with the times

F&I Insurance last year celebrated 21 years of business and expansion with the appointment of a new Managing Director. This move heralds continued growth in the marketplace according to Executive Director and ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Healthcare »

Image

Investment »

Image

Life »

Image

Retirement »

Advertise Here
Image
Image
Image
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Reinsurance Premium:

The premium paid by the ceding company to the reinsurer in consideration for the liability assumed by the reinsurer. On a proportional treaty the premium is a pro-rata share of the ceding company’s gross premium less a ceding (or exchange) commission. On excess of loss treaties the premium is a percentage of the ceding company’s gross premium income for the class of business being reinsured. These premiums are usually calculated annually and ...
More Definitions »

 

Advertise

 

eZine

 

Contact IG

 

Media Pack

 

RSS Feeds

By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Insurance Gateway (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2021. All Rights Reserved.