Image
Icon

Directory

IconAppraisers and Valuers
IconAssociations and Institutes
IconBBBEE Consulting and Verification Agencies
IconConsumer Protection
IconCorporate Governance
IconCredit Bureaus
IconDefensive Driver Training
IconEmergency Medical Rescue
IconForensic Investigation Services
IconInsurance Brokers - Alphabetical Listing
IconInsurance Brokers by Type of Product or Service Needed
IconInsurance Companies
IconInsurance Consultants
IconLightning Damage & Surge Protection Specialists
IconOmbud
IconOnline Quotes and Cover
IconPremium Financing
IconPublic Loss Adjustors
IconPublications
IconRating Agencies
IconRegulatory Authorities
IconRisk Finance
IconRisk Management
IconRisk Surveyors
IconSalvage Operators
IconTelephone Quotes
IconVehicle Accident Management
IconVehicle and Household Risk Inspection Services
IconVehicle Tracking
IconWellness Programs
Advertise Here
  Subscribe To »

UK: The Final Brexit Countdown Begins to Unfold

Published

2017

Tue

24

Jan

 
By Coface, the international trade credit insurance company
 
On 17th January 2017, Theresa May, the British Prime Minister (PM) who is expected to trigger article 50 of the Treaty on European Union1 (EU) by the end of March, outlined her blueprint for the UK’s exit from the EU.
 
Six months after she succeeded David Cameron in the aftermath of the June 23rd referendum, Mrs May made her fullest statement yet on her approach to Brexit, finally getting rid of the vague mantra of “Brexit means Brexit”. In a 12-point plan for Brexit, the Prime Minister made clear that she wanted a clean break from the EU, substantiating the idea that she would pursue what detractors labelled a “hard Brexit” and deciding to withdraw the UK from the single market.
 
Theresa May endorses hard Brexit
Mrs May, at last, lifted some uncertainties surrounding the future relationship between the UK and the EU. In a long-anticipated speech, she confirmed that she interpreted the vote on June 23rd as a mandate for a clean break from the EU and ruled out the adoption of a model that would put the UK “half-in, half-out”.
 
Mrs May judged that, in the trade-off between free movement of people and membership to the single market2, control of immigration should be at the expense of the latter. The PM also emphasised that the government would not seek full membership of the customs union, which would in effect, prevent the UK from negotiating independent bilateral trade deals with the rest of the world. The emphasis on ending the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice also pleased hard-line Brexiteers.
 
A transition period to limit the impact of a Brexit shock
Mrs May stressed that Britain would seek a “new, comprehensive, bold and ambitious Free Trade Agreement (FTA)”. This statement seems to confirm that the government will push for a “customised” bilateral agreement, which would focus on key sectors. Its main goal is to make trade with the EU as “frictionless as possible” and will aim for a partial customs agreement. She also acknowledged the need for a transition period in order to “give business enough time” to adjust. Hence, she pleaded for a “phased process of implementation”.
 
Westminster will get a final vote on the deal
Anticipating the High Court decision due later this month, Mrs May made clear that she would put the deal (expected to be obtained in late 2018) to a vote in both Houses of Parliament3. Pro-EU campaigners welcomed this decision, as they hope it will soften her stance in the negotiation. Nevertheless, she did not explain what would happen if the deal was turned down in Westminster.
 
Hardly veiled threats
With Brexit talks set to begin in late March, this speech was also an opportunity for Mrs. May to demonstrate the British government’s bargaining power in future negotiations. Responding to voices calling for a “punitive deal”, the PM warned that she was ready to walk away from the negotiation table: “no deal for Britain was better than a bad deal for Britain”, she asserted. Mrs May echoed the declarations from the Chancellor4 – Philip Hammond – when she asserted that Britain would aggressively cut taxes and red tape to poach investment and foreign companies.
 
A sense of clarity gives a short-lived boost to the pound
Investors responded positively to the general tone of Mrs May’s speech. The greater degree of clarity on the government’s objective, the pledge to give a vote to Parliament, as well as the acknowledgment of a need for a transition period provided investors with a sense of relief.
 
Mr Trump’s observation in the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday that the strong dollar was “killing” the American economy probably amplified the pound’s sharp rise. On equity markets, London’s FTSE 100, mainly export-oriented, headed in the other direction and fell 1.5%. European stock markets also closed in the red but, contrary to the FTSE 100, mitigated their losses after Mrs May’s speech.
 
Risks
Brexit likely to hit growth in 2017
The British economy has proved quite resilient since the referendum thanks to a buoyant services sector and private consumption. Nevertheless, with higher inflation (2.5% in 2017, on the back of a lower GBP), the private consumption is likely to erode in 2017. Business investment is also expected to slow until uncertainties on the outcome of the negotiations are lifted. The construction and automotive sectors could be impacted by higher prices of imported materials. Exporting sectors are not the most at risk in the short-term, as they could benefit from the lower level of the pound. Coface GDP growth forecast for 2017 for the UK remains subdued at 1.1% this year.
 
The United Kingdom in peril?
First Minister of Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon, speaking after Mrs May, stressed that a new vote on Scottish independence was now “all but inevitable”. With 68% of Scottish voters backing “remain” in last year’s referendum, Mrs May’s decision to move away from the single market brings closer a second referendum (after the one held in 2014). Hence, it may prove challenging for Mrs May to deliver on her pledge to preserve the “precious union” between England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales. In spite of a pledge to avoid a “hard border” between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, Mrs May’s announcement did not solve the issue.
 
Cliff-edge risk is not excluded
Mrs May’s speech gave greater clarity on the objectives pursued by the British government. However, it is all but a closed deal and results will depend on how much the EU and the 27 countries are ready to concede. Brexit talks might not be fractious but with Mrs May contemplating a scenario in which there is “no deal for Britain”, a serious economic shock for Britain and Europe cannot be ruled out.
 
Expecting to trigger Article 50 by the end of March, Mrs May gave herself only two years to negotiate a comprehensive FTA. This period seems very short. By comparison, it took seven years to conclude the CETA5. Moreover, the PM did not mention her intention regarding the EU financial services “passport” nor did she detail how she plans to deal with the three million European citizens living in the UK and the 1.2 million British expats across the EU, two issues that could prove contentious in the negotiation.
 
1 Article 50 of the Treaty on EU sets out the two-year process by which a member state may withdraw from the EU.
2 Membership to the single market entails the free movement of goods, capital, services and people (known as the “four freedoms”).
3 House of Commons and House of Lords
4 Treasury Secretary 
5 Comprehensive Economic and Trade agreement - EU-Canada FTA 
 
To learn more about Coface visit us at www.coface.com.
 
Source: CharlesSmithAssoc/Sha-Izwe Communications
 
« Back to previous page Print this page » |
 

Breaking News »

When does a claim under a liability policy prescribe?

A claim for indemnification under a liability insurance contract only arises when liability to a third party for a certain amount has been established. For purposes of prescription, the debt becomes due when the ...
Read More »

  

SAIA Encourages Property and Household Contents Owners to Take Precautions During Load Shedding

The South African Insurance Association (SAIA) urges all property and household contents owners to exercise all precautions in an effort to mitigate the risks associated with load shedding and power cuts. The recent ...
Read More »

  

Guard against under-insurance

If you are under-insured, you may only be paid out partially for a loss   Having a solid understanding of the implications of underinsurance is crucial at a time when many South Africans are financially ...
Read More »

  

Prep like a pro - top risk and insurance tips for the holidays

As the excitement of heading off for some much needed R&R sets in, take some time out from the shopping, travel arrangements and last minute work wrap-ups to secure your home, assets and loved ones before you ...
Read More »

 

More News »

Image

Healthcare »

Image

Investment »

Image

Life »

Image

Retirement »

Advertise Here
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Advertise Here

From The Glossary »

Icon

Evidence Of Insurability:

Personal information presented by an applicant for life insurance to the life insurance company from which the company determines the acceptability of the life to be insured and any premium loading or special conditions in the event that the proposed life to be insured is ‘substandard’. Evidence of insurability usually consists of statements by the life to be insured in the proposal, a medical examination, or non-medical data submitted in lieu ...
More Definitions »

 

Advertise

 

eZine

 

Contact IG

 

Media Pack

 

RSS Feeds

By using this website you agree to the Terms of Use.
Copyright © Insurance Gateway (Pty) Ltd 2004 - 2020. All Rights Reserved.